deen
Comparative Test HP Officejet Pro 8500 vs.Samsung CLX-3175FW: Energy Consumption
Seite
Hinweis: Für mindestens einen erwähnten Drucker ist der ausführliche Testbericht "Tinten-AIO gegen Laser-Alleskönner" verfügbar.
DC checks energy consumption assuming the following conditions:
- AIOs are running 24 hours a day
- 100 pages of text and graphics are printed per day
- These pages are printed in one job
If several smaller jobs have to be printed, Samsungs result would be even worse, since the fuser unit has to be heated up for every single job.
| Energy consumption | ||
|---|---|---|
| HP Officejet Pro 8500 Wireless AIO | Samsung CLX-3175FW | |
| Apparent out | 0,4 watts | 0,0 watts |
| Standby | 5,4 watts | 9,5 watts |
| Printing *1 | 3,0 watts | 35,0 watts |
| Standby costs p.a. | 8,99 Euros | 15,81 Euros |
| Energy costs of print p.a. | 0,15 Euros | 1,73 Euros |
| Overall energy costs p.a. | 9,14 Euros | 17,54 Euros |
| © Druckerchannel | ||
| Annual consumption costs (19 cents per kWh) | |
|---|---|
| HP Officejet Pro 8500 Wireless AIO | 9.14 Euros |
| Samsung CLX-3175FW | 17.54 Euros |
| © Druckerchannel | |
Dieser Artikel wurde ohne generative KI erstellt.
15.05.09 11:40 (letzte Änderung)
